Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoore, Louellaen_US
dc.dateOctober 2014en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-05en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-02T14:38:19Z
dc.date.available2015-01-05en_US
dc.date.available2018-11-02T14:38:19Z
dc.identifier.otherSchool of Business Working Paper Series; No. 159en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://wuir.washburn.edu/handle/10425/248
dc.description.abstractJournal "quality" lists are pervasive in university level accounting programs, yet the academic literature leaves the specific institutional processes attending voluntary list adoptions largely unexamined. This study explores 1) the role of governments and accrediting agencies in the journal rating project, 2) parallels between the journal rating project and performance assessment tools in business settings, and 3) the linguistic foundations which support usage of constructs with divergent meanings in professional and popular culture.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipKAW Valley Banken_US
dc.format.mediumPDFen_US
dc.language.isoEngen_US
dc.publisherWashburn University, School of Businessen_US
dc.subjectAccountingen_US
dc.subjectHigher educationen_US
dc.subjectBibliographical citationsen_US
dc.subjectPeriodicalsen_US
dc.subjectAccreditation (Education)en_US
dc.subjectJournal listsen_US
dc.subjectCitation analysisen_US
dc.subjectLinguisticsen_US
dc.subjectLegitimationen_US
dc.subjectPersonnel assessmenten_US
dc.subjectBrandsen_US
dc.titleExamining the journal rating project: Players, process, and purposeen_US
dc.typeWorking paperen_US
washburn.identifier.cdm178en_US
washburn.identifier.oclcen_US
washburn.source.locationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record