What is Accuracy?: Problematizing a Basic Accounting Construct

dc.contributor.authorMoore, Louellaen_US
dc.dateDecember 2014en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-02T14:38:21Z
dc.date.available2018-11-02T14:38:21Z
dc.date.issued2014-12-1
dc.description.abstractSection 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002) requires financial officers to sign a statement certifying that financial reports are accurate. Similarly, American defense contractors must affirm that cost accounting disclosures are current, accurate, and complete (DCCA 8-206b 2013). Yet neither set of regulations is explicit as to what it means to be accurate. While accuracy seems to be a basic objective of accounting practice, the construct has received surprisingly little academic attention. Why is that? . . . This essay looks for interdisciplinary connections that can deepen the accounting field's practical understanding of the ontological and epistemological status of the accuracy construct in a societal context. This paper problematizes the accuracy construct in order to understand its role and limits within accounting practice and pedagogy.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipKaw Valley Banken_US
dc.format.mediumPDFen_US
dc.identifier.otherSchool of Business Working Paper Series; No. 170en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10425/257
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWashburn University. School of Businessen_US
dc.subjectAccounting, Accuracy, Quality controlen_US
dc.titleWhat is Accuracy?: Problematizing a Basic Accounting Constructen_US
dc.typeWorking paperen_US
washburn.identifier.cdm186en_US
washburn.identifier.oclc903404509en_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
187.pdf
Size:
2.81 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format