Do Seasoned Offerings Really Signal Anything Significant from Insiders?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Walker, Rosemary
Kwak, Sungkyu
Hull, Robert M.

Issue Date

2008-02-1

Type

Working paper

Language

en_US

Keywords

Announcement period stock returns , Inside ownership , Seasoned equity offerings , Signaling theory , Stock ownership

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

We examine the impact of insider behavior that accompanies seasoned offerings (SEOs) and discover three unexpected findings. First, firms with greater insider ownership percentages underperform before SEOs compared to firms with lesser percentages. Second, insiders can use SEOs to maximize their own short-run welfare because the response to an SEO announcement does not depend on the "change" in insider ownership percentages but only on the "absolute" percentage that remains after the offering. Third, firms that undergo greater decreases in insider ownership perform much better after SEOs. This finding is economically and statistically significant suggesting that investors should be skeptical of insider ability to predict future performance. In fact, the evidence suggests investors should do just the opposite of insiders!

Description

Citation

Publisher

Washburn University. School of Business

Rights

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

ISSN

EISSN